2020 Cross-Border Corporate Criminal Liability Survey

International businesses operate in an environment in which there is an expansion of corporate criminal liability and a trend toward imposing greater demands on corporate compliance and self-governance. Resolutions of criminal investigations that include a company's agreement to pay massive financial penalties are becoming increasingly common, as is political pressure to prosecute executives alleged to be responsible for corporate crimes. But while these directional trends are clear, the fact is there are significant differences in how countries around the world approach corporate criminal liability and how they enforce their laws. 

This Survey is intended to aid multinational companies in assessing and mitigating foreign and cross-jurisdictional enforcement risk. It covers key corporate criminal laws and principles in 31 countries and territories around the globe, focusing on concepts such as if and when a corporation can be held criminally liable; potential penalties and collateral consequences associated with a corporate conviction; extraterritorial application of criminal laws; and the mitigating impact, if any, of having a corporate compliance program. It also depicts key aspects of the enforcement landscape, including the types of resolutions available; government guidance on prosecution decisions; government incentives to corporations (and whistleblowers) to report wrongdoing; and whether the country is known to cooperate with enforcement authorities in other countries.

Read the full Survey.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.