Anti money Laundering Year In Review

2021 Anti-Money Laundering and Sanctions Year in Review

2021 was a precedent-setting year for anti-money laundering ("AML") enforcement and legislation. The digital assets industry continued to grow exponentially, driving the associated AML risks to the forefront of regulatory concerns. In the United States, the new administration established corruption, including money laundering, as a core national security interest. Legislators and regulators alike called for a "whole of government" approach to combatting illicit activity associated with cryptocurrencies, and federal agencies—from OFAC to the FDIC—issued long-awaited guidance for the virtual asset industry. 

In the European Union, lawmakers introduced a comprehensive legislative package to harmonize the Union's approach to AML and countering the financing of terror ("CFT"). The proposal calls for the creation of a new AML authority and advances efforts to establish a "single rulebook" for AML/CFT in the European Union. 

In Mainland China, new legislation expanded the list of entities subject to AML requirements to include loan companies, insurance agents, and insurance brokers, among others. In Australia, legislative amendments were enacted to reform certain customer due diligence and identification procedures. 

This Year in Review explores the above developments and discusses other notable legislative and enforcement activity, including cross-border and intergovernmental initiatives. The Year in Review also provides an outlook on emerging trends and the resulting implications for financial institutions in 2022 and beyond.

Read the White Paper.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.