Insights

Criminal_Jury_Trials_in_a_Global_Pandemic_SOCIAL

Criminal Jury Trials in a Global Pandemic: Safeguarding the Constitutional Rights of the Accused

The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that, "in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense." The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on the ability of individuals to travel and assemble at all, much less to convene in the close quarters of a jury, present particular challenges for the U.S. criminal justice system. 

In the face of this pandemic, how can the accused's Sixth Amendment rights be safeguarded—in particular, how can criminal defendants be assured that their trials will be "speedy and public," that their fates will be determined by an "impartial jury" drawn from the district, that they may be "confronted by witnesses against [them]" in a constitutionally adequate way, and that they will have the effective assistance of defense counsel? 

This Jones Day White Paper explores the tension between preserving the health and safety of the public and the demands of justice with respect to criminal trials.

Read the full White Paper.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.
Contributors