Cases & Deals

Texas Keystone prevails against claim brought by Excalibur Ventures

Clients Texas Keystone Incorporated

Jones Day successfully defended Texas Keystone Inc., a U.S. oil and gas company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, against Excalibur Ventures' $1.6 billion claim for an interest in various petroleum fields in Iraqi Kurdistan. The 57 day trial was the longest and one of the most complex held in London’s Commercial Court this judicial year.

The case was tried in the English Commercial Court between October 8, 2012 and March 1, 2013. On September 10, 2013 the Court handed down its judgment dismissing all claims against Texas Keystone and the other defendants (Gulf Keystone Petroleum Limited, Gulf Keystone Petroleum International Limited, and Gulf Keystone Petroleum (UK) Limited) and deciding all issues in favor of the defendants.

Jones Day partner Stephen Pearson of the Firm's New York and London Offices said: "We are extremely pleased with the Court's judgment. Businesses like Texas Keystone face an increasingly complex legal environment, particularly in contentious matters, which can often involve having to deal in a coordinated manner with multiple proceedings in different countries. The complex and transatlantic nature of this case meant that Texas Keystone needed our Firm’s global reach and ability to deliver across practices and offices."

In addition to handling the English proceeding, Jones Day also acted for Texas Keystone in the related ICC arbitration in New York and in three separate district court proceedings across the U.S.

Jones Day partner Roy Powell of the Pittsburgh Office said: "Though Texas Keystone is based in Pittsburgh, this case involved disputes associated with a major oil concession in Kurdistan, Iraq. Excalibur was extremely well-funded and the case resulted in complex proceedings before the ICC in New York and U.S. Federal Courts in Connecticut, Washington, D.C., and Texas. A coordinated strategy between our lawyers in London, Pittsburgh, New York, Washington, and Houston was critical to the positive outcome."

Robert Kozel, Board Member and former President and CEO of Texas Keystone said: "We have had to endure more than two-and-a-half years of litigation and a 57 day trial, but we never doubted for a moment that we would be vindicated. We are extraordinarily happy with the outcome, but always believed that the legal system would conclude that Texas Keystone and Gulf Keystone acted ethically and properly in all respects in connection with the Shaikan oil concession and in its dealings with Excalibur. In truth this is a claim that should never have been brought and we were determined to fight it. We are grateful for the support of all of the employees of Texas Keystone and our lawyers at Jones Day who served us well throughout. I believe Jones Day’s depth on both sides of the Atlantic and its ability to act as one firm worldwide made a tremendous difference to the outcome."

Pivotal developments

Throughout the case, Jones Day successfully assisted Texas Keystone with a number of pivotal developments. The firm successfully argued that Excalibur should not be granted a stay of the Commercial Court proceedings in London in favor of the ICC arbitration in New York since it had submitted to the English jurisdiction on more than just a protective basis. Excalibur issued two actions in the UK and sought a variety of ancillary orders including a failed request for a worldwide freezing injunction. Excalibur subsequently terminated the parallel ICC proceedings it had commenced in New York.

In December 2011, Texas Keystone and the Gulf defendants successfully applied for security for their costs of the Commercial Court proceedings.

In June 2012, Texas Keystone and the Gulf defendants successfully applied for specific disclosure from Excalibur of documents primarily bearing upon Excalibur's ability to raise funds for both the concession rights and to pursue this litigation. This included detail of its financial capability to participate in the oil concession and third party funding arrangements for the litigation.

At the same time, Texas Keystone also gathered key evidence about Excalibur and its principals from third parties in the U.S., utilizing procedures available under U.S. law. This involved initiating proceedings in Connecticut, Washington D.C., and Texas, all of which were heavily contested.

In January 2013, Texas Keystone and the Gulf defendants successfully applied for additional security for their costs of the Commercial Court proceedings.

A truly international case

While the trial eventually took place in the Commercial Court in London, the claims were principally governed by New York law. Further, the Collaboration Agreement was in part to be operated in accordance with Kurdish law. Additionally, Texas Keystone is based in Pittsburgh and incorporated in Texas; Excalibur is based in Delaware; and Gulf Keystone (one of the Gulf defendants) is based in Bermuda.

The transatlantic Jones Day team on this matter was led by partners Stephen Pearson (London/New York) and Roy Powell (Pittsburgh) and included partners Peter Laun (Pittsburgh) and Lee DeJulius (Pittsburgh), as well as associates Daniel Travers (London), Lisa Allenden (London), Elizabeth Smith (London), Julia Carson (London), Katelyn Matscherz (Pittsburgh), Anderson Bailey (Pittsburgh), Ira Karoll (Pittsburgh), Benjamin Verney (Pittsburgh), and Nina Yadava (New York). Other attorneys in Jones Day's Pittsburgh, New York, Washington D.C., and Houston offices were also involved throughout the case.

Excalibur Ventures LLC and Texas Keystone Inc. and others, Claim No. 2010 Folio 1517 (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court - Court of England and Wales); Excalibur Ventures LLC v. Texas Keystone, Inc., Gulf Keystone Petroleum, et al. v. Psari Holdings Limited, et al., No. 2010 Folio 1517 (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court – Court of England and Wales) [2014] EWHC 3436 (Comm)

We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies and other tracking technologies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies.