Insights

Supreme Court of Florida Creates Statewide Standard for Artificial Intelligence Certification in Court Filings

On May 28, 2026, the Supreme Court of Florida (the "Court") amended Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 to now require the signer of any document filed in a Florida court to certify that all legal authorities exist and are accurately cited. Failure to comply may result in sanctions.

The Court simultaneously entered an administrative order preempting existing circuit court administrative orders that required AI-related disclosures or certifications. The Court explained that the amendment is intended to establish a uniform statewide standard and replace the existing patchwork of circuit court administrative orders regarding the use of AI certifications.

 

The Court emphasized that the amendment does not limit a court's authority to address the misuse of AI. Instead, all Florida courts must now rely on amended Rule 2.515(d)(2) and its enforcement provisions. After notice and an opportunity to be heard, courts may impose sanctions for filings that are inconsistent with a signer's certification. Available sanctions include reprimand, contempt, striking a filing, dismissal of proceedings, costs, attorney's fees, or other appropriate relief.

 

Amended Rule 2.515(d)(2) and the accompanying administrative order apply to both attorneys and pro se litigants and went into effect on June 15, 2026, at 12:01 a.m.        

           

 

 

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.