Transactional Analysis: IRA Rollback Redirects Venture Capital in Climate Technology
The Inflation Reduction Act ("IRA") functioned as the cornerstone of U.S. clean-technology capital investments. From its enactment in 2022 through late 2024, the statute's long-dated production and investment tax credits, alongside federal grants and loan guarantees, have helped catalyze more than $400 billion in announced clean-energy projects and attract a record infusion of domestic and cross-border venture capital ("VC") into early-stage climate technology. The Trump administration's executive orders that effectively terminate or suspend IRA-authorized federal funding, coupled with fast-tracked congressional efforts to accelerate phaseouts of energy tax credits, have now reversed those tailwinds and injected material uncertainty into U.S. deal flow.
For domestic investors, the rollback undermines the fundamental risk-return profile that justified aggressive climate allocations. Early-stage technologies—particularly in electrolytic hydrogen, next-generation batteries, and carbon-intensive industrial process abatement—had been modeled on 10-year credit visibility and an expanding pool of downstream project finance. According to an industry advocacy group, roughly $15.5 billion of clean-energy projects have been cancelled through April, depriving portfolio companies of offtake anchors and eroding exit valuations. For deals that are not cancelled outright, term sheets are being redrafted to include "IRA-contingent" covenants, stepped-down earnouts, and broader material-adverse-change language. As capital costs rise and regulatory clarity recedes, many U.S. funds are triaging follow-on rounds and prioritizing less policy-exposed assets, such as software-enabled efficiency or grid analytics.
At the same time, the rollback is propelling a marked geographical reallocation of venture dollars. Recent commentary from global climate funds highlights Europe's appeal as a more policy-stable jurisdiction: The EU Green Deal Industrial Plan, complemented by tightening efficiency mandates for data centers and those proposed for heavy industry, delivers clear revenue signals without the specter of wholesale repeal. Some fund managers have publicly stated intentions to weight new vehicles toward Scandinavian, UK, and continental European opportunities. Parallel interest is emerging in Canada, India, and segments of Latin America where national incentive programs remain intact. The Johns Hopkins Net Zero Industrial Policy Lab estimates that up to $80 billion in battery and solar supply-chain investment could be diverted abroad under an aggressive U.S. retreat—a figure that, if realized, would meaningfully enlarge foreign investment pipelines.
The shift is not, however, a zero-sum windfall for offshore markets. Valuations that were previously buoyed by IRA-driven competitive pressure are compressing, and European investors now confront currency risk, burgeoning demand for project interconnection, and nascent local content rules. Moreover, selective elements of the U.S. framework for tax credits could remain untouched despite the passage of the "One Big, Beautiful Bill Act," preserving discrete niches for domestic deployment capital. Data-center power procurement, increasingly indifferent to generation source, is also creating openings for gas-peaker retrofits and modular nuclear technologies, both of which can support venture-backed service providers.
Looking forward, the transactional landscape will pivot on legislative timing. If a partial compromise preserves core credits beyond 2028, a subset of investors may reenter with structured downside protection. Absent that, U.S. VC participation is likely to stagnate, and corporate venture units may redirect balance-sheet commitments toward cross-border joint ventures that can satisfy global decarbonization mandates more predictably.
For counsel and capital providers alike, the imperative is twofold: reprice policy risk with granular diligence on statutory exposure and develop jurisdiction-agnostic syndication strategies capable of arbitraging uneven regulatory trajectories. In a post-IRA rollback environment, mobility of capital—not merely technological differentiation—will define competitive advantage.
Read the full Climate Report.
