Insights

  • Home
  • Insights
  • Jones Day Talks Intellectual Property: Monkey See, Monkey Sue?—Copyright Implications of the "Monkey Selfie" Case

Share

Jones Day Talks Intellectual Property: Monkey See, Monkey Sue?—Copyright Implications of the "Monkey Selfie" Case

Jones Day Talks Intellectual Property: Monkey See, Monkey Sue?—Copyright Implications of the "Monkey Selfie" Case

May 2018 Jones Day Publications

The "monkey selfie" matter raises intriguing questions regarding the current state of U.S. copyright laws. Courts have ruled that a non-human can’t be granted copyright protection, but then what are the implications for works created via artificial intelligence? Jones Day partners Meredith Wilkes and Emily Tait discuss the aftermath of Naruto v. Slater and explain how companies can guard and protect their creative work.

Find previous podcasts on the Jones Day Talks website.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

You May Also Be Interested In

April 2024 Blog

“Known” Claim Elements Alone Insufficient for Motivation to Combine, PTAB Litigation Blog

April 2024 Alert

USPTO Issues New Guidance on Practitioners' Use of AI

April 2024 White Paper

Fifteenth Anniversary Update: Annotated Local Patent Rules for the Northern District of Illinois

April 2024 Blog

Availability of Document on Government Website Insufficient for Institution, PTAB Litigation Blog

Before sending, please note:

Information on www.jonesday.com is for general use and is not legal advice. The mailing of this email is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Anything that you send to anyone at our Firm will not be confidential or privileged unless we have agreed to represent you. If you send this email, you confirm that you have read and understand this notice.