RhysThomas

Partner

London + 44.20.7039.5101

Connect:

Share

Rhys Thomas has been assisting clients in resolving complex, international disputes for more than 15 years through litigation, arbitration, and mediation. He has advised multinational corporations, private equity firms, and high net worth individuals on high-stakes disputes, often having a cross-border dimension, including in particular in the Russian Federation and CIS, the Middle East, and Africa.

Rhys frequently represents clients in substantial shareholder and joint venture disputes, breach of warranty claims‎, as well as fraud proceedings and asset tracing. He has a particular focus on the technology sector and has substantial experience advising on disputes and investigations arising out of complex IT projects, as well as contentious cyber security issues and cyber fraud. Rhys has served secondments at two of the world's leading technology services companies.

Recent representations include advising the City of Moscow in the defense of an LCIA arbitration claim for more than US$2 billion arising from a joint venture for the redevelopment of a landmark Moscow hotel complex, a leading technology services company in disputes arising from a $400 million contract for a global ERP implementation, and high net worth individuals in relation to a complex £100 million breach of trust claim.

Experience

  • International technology company seeks advice in connection with internal investigation of high-profile data loss incidentJones Day advised an international technology company in connection with an internal investigation of a high-profile data loss incident, later representing the client in a subsequent public inquiry.
  • FTSE 100 technology company resolves £25 million data security breach claimsJones Day advised a FTSE 100 technology company in breach of warranty claims under a share purchase agreement, alleging breaches of data and technology warranties arising from alleged PCI-DSS non-compliance.
  • Sibir Energy pursues action relating to the alleged misappropriation of over $400 millionJones Day has been acting for the energy company, Sibir Energy Plc, in relation to the high profile misappropriation of sums exceeding US$400 million by former directors and shareholders.
  • Avanti Communications recovers more than $20 million award against Indonesian MoDJones Day successfully obtained an expedited arbitral award of more than $20 million on behalf of Avanti Communications Group PLC in London LCIA proceedings brought against the Indonesian Ministry of Defence.
  • Global engineering company defends arbitration claims relating to military technology projectJones Day defended a global engineering and manufacturing company in relation to an LCIA arbitration alleging defects in the design and manufacture of nuclear, biological, and chemical filtration systems for tanks and military vehicles.
  • City of Moscow defends US$2 billion international arbitration claimJones Day is representing the Government of the City of Moscow and its affiliate, OEK-Finance, in the defense of a LCIA arbitration claim for over US$2 billion arising from a joint venture for the redevelopment of a landmark Moscow hotel complex.
  • Global payments company secures substantial settlement of complex cyber fraud claimsJones Day advised a global payments company in relation to a series of LCIA arbitration claims seeking compensation from African counterpart banks in relation to a complex, multi-million dollar cyber fraud.
  • Consortium of 700 investors seeks advice in £320 million tax-driven collective investment schemeJones Day is advising investors in a tax-driven scheme to invest in carbon emission trading and research and development.
  • Technology services provider defends against $50 million under-licensing claim involving a military personnel databaseJones Day defended a technology services provider in a $50 million under-licensing claim by an international software company in connection with a military personnel database.
  • Technology services provider defends against breach of contract claim alleging defective supply of hardware and softwareJones Day defended a technology services provider against a multimillion pound breach of contract claim brought by the U.K. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority in relation to the supply of allegedly defective Storage Area Network hardware and software.
  • Global technology services company seeks injunctive relief against major industry competitor to enforce non-solicitation and non-compete clausesJones Day acted for a global technology services company seeking injunctive relief enforcing non-solicitation and non-compete clauses against a major industry competitor.
  • Global Voice Networks conducts expert determination process with Viatel involving operating costs for fibre transfer agreementJones Day represented euNetworks in its expert determination process with Viatel concerning the correct apportionment of operating costs in relation to their combined fibre optic network assets.
  • Healthcare group defends against action alleging fraud in connection with hospital developments in Western AfricaJones Day represented a healthcare group as the defendants in proceedings arising from an alleged fraud in obtaining £20m export credit insurance coverage in connection with hospital developments in Western Africa.
    • View All

    September 2018 Commentaries

    Muddy Road Ahead Part II: Liability Legislation for Autonomous Vehicles in the United Kingdom

    August 2016 Commentaries

    The New EU Cybersecurity Directive: What Impact on Digital Service Providers?

    January 2010 Commentaries

    GB Gas Holdings v Accenture
    We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies and other tracking technologies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies.

    Before sending, please note:

    Information on www.jonesday.com is for general use and is not legal advice. The mailing of this email is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Anything that you send to anyone at our Firm will not be confidential or privileged unless we have agreed to represent you. If you send this email, you confirm that you have read and understand this notice.