Insights

Texas Supreme Court to Further Examine Disclaimer of Reliance Clauses

The Texas Supreme Court is scheduled to review reliance disclaimer clauses and their enforceability in December 2018 and may provide further guidance on these issues.

The Texas Supreme Court recently granted review in Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, et al. v. Carduco, Inc. d/b/a Cardenas Metroplex, Case No. 16-0644, setting oral argument for December 2018. In a far-ranging opinion, the court of appeals in part affirmed a jury verdict for the plaintiff for fraudulent inducement, despite the existence of a contractual disclaimer of reliance clause. Plaintiff Carduco alleged Mercedes fraudulently induced the company into purchasing a dealership by leading Carduco to believe that the dealership could be moved to McAllen, Texas, but concealing that Mercedes planned to give that area to another dealer. While Mercedes asserted several grounds for review, and the plaintiff sought review over a reduction of punitive damages, one central legal issue is the reliance element of fraud and whether it was negated as a matter of law based on contractual terms.

The appellate court held the relevant contract's disclaimer of reliance was unenforceable. Mercedes' "Standard Provisions," incorporated by reference into the contract, read: "no representations outside of the contract were made by MBUSA" and "no such representations or statements were relied upon by Carduco in executing the contract." The court held this was not a clear and unequivocal disclaimer of reliance as: (i) the parties were not in a dispute at the time; (ii) the standard terms were not negotiated; and (iii) the disclaimer did not state that Carduco was relying on its own judgment. The court of appeals also noted that Carduco's reliance was sufficiently justified. According to the court, the terms of the contract stating that Carduco did not have an exclusive right to sell in its area and that moving required prior written consent were not in direct conflict with the oral representations.

Mercedes asked the Texas Supreme Court to resolve a claimed conflict between the lower court's decision and other courts of appeal in Texas that have enforced similar disclaimers. Importantly, the Texas Supreme Court's ruling may provide guidance both on the drafting of such reliance disclaimer clauses and their enforceability, which is an oft-litigated issue in Texas.  


Lawyer Contacts

For further information, please contact your principal Firm representative or the lawyers listed below. General email messages may be sent using our "Contact Us" form, which can be found at www.jonesday.com/contactus/.

J. Laurens Wilkes
Houston
+1.832.239.3796
jlwilkes@jonesday.com

Jane W. Walker
Houston
+1.832.239.3758
jwwalker@jonesday.com

William R. Taylor
Houston
+1.832.239.3860
wrtaylor@jonesday.com

Jones Day publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our "Contact Us" form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. The mailing of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.

We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies and other tracking technologies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies.