FCPA 2016 Year in Review

FCPA 2016 Year in Review

Read the FCPA 2016 Year in Review.


In 2016, a year after the sharp decrease in both the number and size of corporate FCPA resolutions, the DOJ's and SEC's enforcement activity rebounded, as reflected by a record number of corporate FCPA resolutions and the collection of a record $2.43 billion in total fines and penalties. This banner year was driven by the resolution of several multijurisdictional corruption investigations, including the largest global corruption case in history.

There were six other key highlights from 2016 FCPA enforcement:

  • The DOJ announced only one enforcement action against an individual in connection with its 11 corporate resolutions, notwithstanding the issuance of the Yates Memo in September 2015. The SEC, meanwhile, settled eight individual enforcement actions, all of which were against current or former employees of a company that entered into a related corporate FCPA resolution with the SEC.
  • A new DOJ initiative, and similar SEC policy pronouncements, that offer incentives to companies that self-disclose FCPA violations, cooperate with the resulting investigations, and remediate compliance issues.
  • A record year of SEC whistleblower awards, including the first-ever FCPA-related award, and an enforcement action against a company that allegedly sought to chill an FCPA whistleblower.
  • Developments in FCPA-related civil litigation, including subjecting disgorgement to a five-year statute of limitations in SEC proceedings and two rulings regarding the scope of FCPA jurisdiction against foreign nationals.
  • Intensified DOJ and SEC cooperation with international anticorruption regulators and an increase in anticorruption activity outside the United States.
  • Possible changes in FCPA enforcement following the election of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States.

Read the full White Paper.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.