Cases & Deals

Value-Added Communications prosecutes breach of patent license agreement in state court and defends patent infringement claim in federal court

Clients Value-Added Communications, Inc.

Jones Day represented telecommunications company Value-Added Communications, Inc. ("VAC") in a patent licensing dispute related to specialized telephone systems used in state and federal prisons. T-NETIX alleged that VAC had violated numerous provisions of the parties' patent licensing agreement and sought to terminate the agreement and recover millions in alleged past-due royalties. Prior to trial, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of VAC finding none of the alleged past-due royalties were owed under the agreement. The key remaining issue involved a determination of whether certain patent applications and proprietary telephone systems and calling features developed by VAC were covered under an "additions and improvements" clause of the patent licensing agreement, which T-NETIX argued granted it exclusive ownership rights in VAC's intellectual property. A five-week jury trial concluded in February 2008, and the jury found itself deadlocked after five days of deliberation. Following the trial, the Court conducted a three-day summary judgment hearing in which it agreed with Jones Day's arguments regarding the interpretation of the "improvements and additions" clause, and that led to a mutually agreeable settlement and new license agreement for our client.

Value-Added Communications, Inc. v. T NETIX, Inc., No. 03-11399-B (Dallas Dist. Ct.); T NETIX, Inc. v. Value-Added Communications, Inc., No. 3:05-CV-0654-D (N.D. Tex.)

We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies and other tracking technologies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies.