PTAB Permits Extra Briefing to Evaluate Request for Rehearing, PTAB Litigation Blog

Visit the PTAB Litigation Blog.

In a recent decision, the PTAB admitted that it erred in its prior determination of unpatentability, and authorized supplemental briefing on the patentability of substitute claims.  See Rimfrost AS v. Aker Biomarine Antarctic AS, IPR2018-00295, Paper No. 40 (PTAB November 22, 2019).  The Board had previously denied Patent Owner’s substitute claims after finding they were invalid over a combination of prior art references.  Patent Owner requested rehearing, noting that the Board improperly relied on a prior art reference not listed in the Petition and the Opposition to Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend the Claims.

Read the full article at

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.