Insights

PSERS Takes Action to Reduce Fees Paid to External Investment Managers

This development represents just one aspect of the ongoing debate over active versus passive asset management.

Earlier this month, Pennsylvania's largest public pension fund, the Public School Employees' Retirement System ("PSERS"), took action to lower the fees that it pays to external investment managers. At its August meeting, PSERS authorized its Investment Professionals to implement a plan that includes renegotiating fee structures and bringing more assets under in-house management. With these steps, PSERS hopes to generate more than $2 billion in savings over 30 years.

At the same time, PSERS's Investment Professionals expressed their belief in the value of active management. The Investment Professionals acknowledged that PSERS "could achieve higher cost savings by recommending low cost index approaches" for certain asset classes. But they also noted their understanding that the "end result would be lower returns and higher costs to the employers and taxpayers," pointing to the "successful history of active management."

The debate over the relative merits of active versus passive asset management is front and center in a public review ongoing in Pennsylvania. At its September and October meetings, Pennsylvania's Public Pension Management and Asset Investment Review Commission ("Commission") will continue studying the costs and benefits of both active and passive investment strategies.

The Vice Chair of the Commission, Pennsylvania Treasurer Joe Torsella, has previously made clear his views on the topic. Soon after taking office in 2017, Torsella stated: "Overwhelming research shows that while some active managers will of course manage to outperform the markets in any given period, it is both extremely difficult for a manger to do so consistently over time, and extremely difficult for investors to identify which managers will outperform in the future. … We can't control investment performance or consistently beat the market, but the one variable we can control is costs—and I have a fiduciary obligation to taxpayers to do so."

We will continue to monitor the proceedings and provide updates as warranted.

Lawyer Contacts

For more information, please contact your principal Jones Day representative or the lawyers listed below. General email messages may be sent using our "Contact Us" form, which can be found at www.jonesday.com/contactus/

Andy Stanton
Pittsburgh
+1.412.394.7936
astanton@jonesday.com

Courtney L. Snyder
Pittsburgh
+1.412.394.7910
clsnyder@jonesday.com

Jayant W. Tambe
New York
+1.212.326.3604
jtambe@jonesday.com

Brian W. Castello
Pittsburgh
+1.412.394.7218
bcastello@jonesday.com

Jones Day publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our "Contact Us" form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. The mailing of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.

We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies and other tracking technologies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies.