Insights

Fifth Circuit Vacates ERISA "Fiduciary Rule": Future Uncertain

Fifth Circuit Vacates ERISA "Fiduciary Rule": Future Uncertain

On March 15, 2018, in a 2–1 decision, the Fifth Circuit vacated all parts of the Department of Labor's so-called "Fiduciary Rule" in Chamber of Commerce, et. al. v. Acosta, No. 17-10238 (5th Cir. March 15, 2018). The Labor Department has 45 days to decide whether to file a petition for rehearing. If it does not, the Fifth Circuit will thereafter issue a mandate within seven days officially vacating the Fiduciary Rule. Accordingly, if the Labor Department takes no action, the prior regulatory definition of "fiduciary" for investment advice purposes, which was struck as part of the Fiduciary Rule, will be reinstated by Monday, May 7, 2018. The Department has not announced whether it plans to challenge the decision, but the press has reported a Department spokesperson as stating that, "pending further review," the Department would not enforce the Fiduciary Rule.

The Fiduciary Rule was promulgated in 2016 and became effective in part on June 9, 2017. It broadened the definition of "fiduciary" services to capture investment "recommendations." This acted to increase the number of entities regulated under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), including the related prohibited transaction and excise tax provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The Fiduciary Rule was accompanied by various administrative exemptions designed to permit otherwise prohibited conduct, albeit subject to new and varied requirements. Many sectors of the financial services and investment industries adjusted their practices and procedures in response to the rule, and several significant companies withdrew entirely from the brokerage and retirement investor market.

The Fifth Circuit held that the Fiduciary Rule "fatally conflicts" with the statutory text of ERISA, departing from the long-standing common-law standard defining a fiduciary relationship as one of trust and confidence, and that the Department "exploited an exemption provision into a comprehensive regulatory framework" that constituted "backdoor regulation." It found, and vacated, all parts of the Fiduciary Rule as arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedures Act. This finding will be applicable after the time periods outlined above if the Department does not seek rehearing or file a motion for a stay of the court's order.

Lawyer Contacts

For further information, please contact your principal Firm representative or one of the lawyers listed below. General email messages may be sent using our "Contact Us" form, which can be found at www.jonesday.com/contactus/.

Laura E. Bader
Chicago
+1.312.269.4190
lbader@jonesday.com  

Kevin R. Noble
Washington
+1.202.879.3882
krnoble@jonesday.com

Jones Day publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our "Contact Us" form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. The mailing of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.

We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies and other tracking technologies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies.