Insights

IPR Proceedings: Extrinsic or Intrinsic Evidence for Claim Construction?, <i>PTAB Litigation Blog</i>

IPR Proceedings: Extrinsic or Intrinsic Evidence for Claim Construction?, PTAB Litigation Blog

Visit the Jones Day PTAB Litigation Blog.

In district courts’ claim construction analyses, intrinsic evidence is of paramount importance. Although extrinsic evidence "may be useful to the court," it is considered “less significant” than the claim language, specification, and prosecution history making up the intrinsic record. Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2005). Further, when "an analysis of the intrinsic evidence alone will resolve any ambiguity in a disputed claim term[,] . . . it is improper to rely on extrinsic evidence." Vitronics Corp. v. Conceptronic, Inc., 90 F.3d 1576, 1583 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies and other tracking technologies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies.