PTAB Issues Notice of Discretionary Denial Rulemaking, PTAB Litigation Blog
Visit the PTAB Litigation Blog
On October 17th, the PTAB issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding criteria for the Office to apply when making discretionary denial determinations.
The proposed rule would:
- Require an IPR petitioner to file a stipulation not to pursue any invalidity challenges under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 or 103 (including product-prior-art-based grounds) in other forums (a Sotera+ stipulation);
- Provide that the USPTO will not institute an IPR when the USPTO (e.g., IPR, reexamination) or another forum (e.g., district court, ITC) already has adjudicated patentability or validity of the claims (regardless of whether the prior challenge was brought by another party); and
- Provide that the USPTO will not institute an IPR when another proceeding is likely to determine patentability or validity of the claims under §§ 102 or 103 first (e.g., the typical Fintiv scenario).
Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.
