Insights

null

PGR Petitions Are “Favored”, PTAB Litigation Blog

Visit the PTAB Litigation Blog

 

In Multi-Color Corp. v. Brook & Whittle Ltd., PGR2025-00025, the PTAB declined to discretionarily deny institution of Multi-Color’s post-grant review petition.  The decision, designated as precedential in January 2026, makes clear that PGR petitions occupy a favored position in the PTAB’s discretionary denial calculus.

 

Based on PTAB developments in 2025, it looked like Brook and Whittle, the patent owner, held a favorable position heading into institution.  The patent at issue was already the subject of two parallel district court proceedings in the Eastern District of Texas and in the District of Delaware.  And trial was set in the E.D. TX. for May 18, 2026, roughly four months before the PGR’s final written decision deadline.  Thus, the district court would have  likely resolved the patent’s validity before the PTAB.  In the IPR context, this kind of timing overlap has historically been one of the strongest arguments for discretionary denial under the Fintiv framework.

 

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.