Insights

Prosecution Error Evidence Timing Considerations

Prosecution Error Evidence & Timing Considerations Sends IPR Forward, PTAB Litigation Blog

Visit the PTAB Litigation Blog

The USPTO’s Acting Deputy Director, Coke Morgan Stewart, issued a decision on October 3, 2025, declining to exercise discretion to deny institution in Carbyne, Inc. v. Tritech Software Systems, IPR2025-00959, Paper 11 (Oct. 3 2025). Carbyne (“Petitioner”) filed its petition on May 9, 2025, challenging U.S. Patent RE50,016 E, entitled “SMS communication during emergencies.” Tritech Software Systems (“Patent Owner”) sought discretionary denial under 35 U.S.C. §§ 314(a) and 325(d), invoking the Fintiv factors and arguing that the petition repackaged prior art previously considered or cumulative of the prosecution record.

* Ruth Brindel, a member of the New Lawyers Group in Jones Day’s Chicago Office, assisted in the preparation of this blog.

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.