Insights

Postfiling Activity May Create Privity Leading T

Post-filing Activity May Create Privity Leading To Section 315(b) Dismissal, PTAB Litigation Blog

Visit the PTAB Litigation Blog.

Under Section 315(b), an IPR may be dismissed as time barred “if the petition requesting the proceeding is filed more than 1 year after the date on which the petitioner, real party in interest, or privy of the petitioner is served with a complaint alleging infringement of the patent.”  35 U.S.C. § 315(b) (emphasis added).  The petitioner bears the burden of establishing that no real parties in interest or privies were served with a complaint more than year prior to filing an IPR.  RØDE Microphones, LLC v. Zaxcom, Inc., IPR2025-00231, Paper 33 (PTAB Aug. 21, 2025). “The determination of whether a nonparty is a real party in interest or privy is made as of the date of institution of a proceeding, even if the relationship between the nonparty and petitioner arises after filing but before institution.”  Id.

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.p

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.