Insights

Court Opts Not To Stay Without Trial Instituted O

Court Opts Not To Stay Without Trial Instituted On All Asserted Patents, PTAB Litigation Blog

Visit the PTAB Litigation Blog

Congress implemented the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”) to “establish a more efficient and streamlined patent system that [would] improve patent quality and limit unnecessary and counterproductive litigation costs.”  77 F. Reg. 48680-01 (Aug. 14, 2012).  Through the AIA, Congress established inter partes reviews (“IPR”) “to create a timely, cost-effective alternative to litigation.”  Id.  In some instances, district courts stay civil patent litigation cases where the patents-in-suit are subject to pending IPR before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”).  But the decision to stay is ultimately left to the district court’s discretion with the court’s inherent power to control its own docket.

* Jessica Vedrani, summer associate in Jones Day’s Boston Office assisted in the preparation of this blog. 


Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.