![Sets of keys](/-/media/images/publications/2022/07/fintiv-denial-despite-stipulation/articleimage/sets-of-keys.jpeg?rev=534e77994a344ef38f424d78aff0f256&la=en&h=675&w=1080&hash=924AF2A8CED2772146DD8F8E6DDD5357)
Fintiv Denial Despite Stipulation, PTAB Litigation Blog
Visit the PTAB Litigation Blog
On May 9, 2022, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board denied Hillman Group, Inc.’s (“Hillman’s”) three petitions for inter partes review. See The Hillman Group, Inc. v. Hy-Ko Products Co. LLC, IPR2022-00168, -00169, and -00174. Parallel litigation in the Eastern District of Texas between these two key-duplication competitors is scheduled to commence in July 2022. In the district court litigation, Hy-Ko Products Company LLC (“Hy-Ko”) alleges that Hillman’s products infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 9,656,332, 9,682,432 and 10,421,133 (the “’332 patent,” “’432 patent,” and “’133 patent,” respectively). Complaint at 16, Hy-Ko Products Co. LLC v. The Hillman Group, Inc., 2-21-cv-00197 (E.D. Tex. 2021). These patents relate generally to apparatuses and methods for duplicating keys, and more specifically, for cutting duplicate keys based on a captured image of a master key. In addition, Hy-Ko alleges that Hillman engaged in false advertising, unlawful conversion of property or receipt of stolen property, unfair competition, and infringement of Hy-Ko’s patents through reverse engineering of an illegally-acquired Hy-Ko key-duplication machine. Complaint at 1, Hy-Ko Products Co. LLC v. The Hillman Group, Inc., 2-21-cv-00197 (E.D. Tex. 2021).
Nicole Newman, in the Boston Office, assisted with the preparation of this Alert