Apple Bite

Indefinite Patent at the ITC May Survive in District Court, ITC Blog

In a recent order issued in the Northern District of Texas, Judge Godbey denied a Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion despite the Federal Circuit’s holding that the asserted patent was invalid as indefinite.  Hyosung TNS, Inc. v. Diebold Nixdorf, Inc., No. 3:16-CV-0364-N (N.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 2019).  The Federal Circuit appeal arose from a related ITC investigation.  Because new evidence not presented on the ITC record may alter a term’s claim construction and, as a result, the asserted patent’s validity, Judge Godbey concluded an issue of fact exists and therefore, denied the motion.

Read the full article on JD Supra.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.