Social Media

New York’s Appellate Division Continues Trend On Discoverability of Social Media

The NY courts are focusing on the appropriateness of discovery sought regardless of the technology in which it is contained.

The NY courts are focusing on the appropriateness of discovery sought regardless of the technology in which it is contained.

As the New York appellate courts continue to consider the discoverability of social media, on January 24, 2019, the New York Appellate Division held in Vasquez-Santos v. Mathew that the defendant may utilize the services of a "data mining" company for a widespread search of the plaintiff's devices, email accounts, and social media accounts for certain discoverable information regarding the credibility of his claim.

Vasquez-Santos is an extension of the recent NY Court of Appeals decision, Forman v. Henkin, holding that a user's "private" Facebook messages and photos are subject to disclosure where that information is "reasonably calculated to contain evidence material and necessary to the litigation."

Plaintiff Vasquez-Santos used to play semi-professional basketball and alleged that his athletic career came to an end following a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff claimed Facebook photos posted after the accident depicting him continuing to play basketball were taken before his accident. To rebut Plaintiff's claims, Defendant sought production of the metadata associated with the photos, potentially showing the date and time the photos were taken, with the assistance of a data mining company. The trial court denied Defendant's motion for such discovery.

Unanimously reversing, the Appellate Division granted defendant the requested data mining access with certain limitations. Vasquez-Santos represents another example of NY courts focusing on the appropriateness of the discovery sought regardless of the new technology in which it is contained. And, like Forman, it is consistent with NY's liberal discovery rules, authorizing "full disclosure of all matter material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action[.]" Although both Forman and Vasquez-Santos arose in the context of personal injury claims, their analysis and approach regarding social media discovery will be instructive for such discovery in many civil cases. The decision also underscores the need for counsel to stay abreast of changing technology and information sources, such as metadata, and how they may be leveraged to assist clients in the pursuit or defense of claims.

For a discussion of the Forman v. Henkin decision see Jones Day's case Alert titled New York's Top Court Rules 7–0: "Private" Facebook Posts Subject to Disclosure.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.