Italian Merger Filing Thresholds Increased
The Italian Competition Authority ("ICA") annually amends the turnover thresholds for notification of transaction based on the gross national product price deflator index. The ICA now has increased the first threshold, relating to the Italian combined turnover of all the undertakings concerned, to € 495 million (which before was €492 million). However, this is not likely to substantially impact on the number of notifiable transactions in Italy.
According to article 16 (1) of Law No. 287/1990 - as recently amended - a merger was reportable to the Italian Competition Authority ("ICA") if two cumulative thresholds were met:
the combined Italian turnover of all the undertakings concerned exceeded €492 million (approximately US$555 million); and
the individual Italian turnover of each of at least two undertakings involved in the transaction exceeded €30 million (approximately US$33.8 million).
Under the current legislation, the ICA annually amends these turnover thresholds based on the gross national product price deflator index. The ICA's decision updating the thresholds (in Italian) is available on the ICA's website.
The current thresholds, updated in March 2018, provide that transactions are reportable to the ICA if:
the combined Italian turnover of all the undertakings concerned exceeds €495 million (approximately US$559 million); and
the individual Italian turnover of each of at least two undertakings involved in the transaction exceeds €30 million (approximately US$33.8 million).
The slight increase in the first set of thresholds, relating to the combined Italian turnover of the undertakings concerned, is not likely to decrease the number of notifiable transactions in Italy.
Entry into force and effects on pending transactions
The updated merger control thresholds entered into force on March 12, 2018. Since, under Italian rules, the relevant date to establish jurisdiction is the closing of a transaction, the updated thresholds will be applicable to deals signed under the old thresholds that will be closed under the updated ones.
For an analysis of the amendment, see our previous Commentary.
Jones Day publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. The mailing of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.