Insights

  • Home
  • Insights
  • PTAB Designates Two 35 U.S.C. §315(b) Cases Informative, PTAB Litigation Blog

Share

PTAB Designates Two 35 U.S.C. §315(b) Cases Informative, <i>PTAB Litigation Blog</i>

PTAB Designates Two 35 U.S.C. §315(b) Cases Informative, PTAB Litigation Blog

January 2018 Blog

Visit the Jones Day PTAB Litigation Blog.

On January 10, 2018, the PTAB designated two decisions weighing on 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) as informative:

  • Luv N’ Care, Ltd. v. McGinley, IPR2017-01216, Paper 13 (P.T.A.B. Sept. 18, 2017) (AIA § 315(b), insufficient funds at filing)
  • Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC. v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., IPR2014-00360, Paper 15 (P.T.A.B. June 27, 2014) (AIA § 315(b), district court motion to amend complaint)

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

You May Also Be Interested In

April 2024 Blog

“Known” Claim Elements Alone Insufficient for Motivation to Combine, PTAB Litigation Blog

April 2024 Alert

USPTO Issues New Guidance on Practitioners' Use of AI

April 2024 White Paper

Fifteenth Anniversary Update: Annotated Local Patent Rules for the Northern District of Illinois

April 2024 Blog

Availability of Document on Government Website Insufficient for Institution, PTAB Litigation Blog

Before sending, please note:

Information on www.jonesday.com is for general use and is not legal advice. The mailing of this email is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Anything that you send to anyone at our Firm will not be confidential or privileged unless we have agreed to represent you. If you send this email, you confirm that you have read and understand this notice.