HannahMehrle

Associate

Cleveland + 1.216.586.1322

Connect:

Share

Hannah Mehrle is an IP lawyer who handles all types of patent litigation and trademark litigation. She practices before U.S. district courts, the International Trade Commission, and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Her experience encompasses many different technologies including semiconductor devices, image sensors, wireless communication systems, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.

Hannah has experience representing clients in IPRs (inter parte reviews) and PGRs (post-grant reviews). Hannah holds a computer science degree and has experience drafting motions and oppositions and working with experts both in matters at the PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) and in district court.

Hannah has been a registered patent attorney since 2020. Utilizing her background as a computer scientist, she has drafted and prosecuted patents in the mechanical, computer, and electrical fields.

Experience

  • NXP settles global patent dispute with MediaTek over semiconductor technologyJones Day represented NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al. as complainant/plaintiff in a patent infringement dispute against competitor MediaTek Inc. et al. before the International Trade Commission (ITC) and the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 
  • Cohesity disposes of six-patent litigation brought by adverse competitor CommvaultJones Day successfully represented Cohesity Inc. ("Cohesity") and obtained dismissal in a six-patent, competitor suit filed by Commvault Systems in April 21, 2020.
  • Riverside and Investcorp sell Arrowhead Engineered Products to GenstarJones Day advised The Riverside Company in the sale of Arrowhead Engineered Products to Genstar.
  • Riverside portfolio company acquires Tiger LightsJones Day represented The Riverside Company in connection with the acquisition and financing by portfolio company Arrowhead Engineered Products, Inc. of Tiger Lights, a leading provider of aftermarket LED lighting accessories for agricultural and industrial equipment including tractors, combines, forklifts, and skid steers.
  • Sunrise Medical defends against patent infringement claims involving power wheelchair suspension technologyJones Day is representing Sunrise Medical (US) LLC in a patent infringement suit brought by Invacare Corporation in the U.S. District Court in Delaware.
  • LeBaronBrown Industries acquires NPS Holdings Inc.Jones Day advised LeBaronBrown Industries LLC in its acquisition of a majority interest in the NPS Towel & Tissue Division of NPT Holdings Inc., a leading towel & tissue and specialty packaging converter.
  • High Road Capital sells portfolio company General Tools & Instruments Company LLC to Worthington Industries, Inc.Jones Day represented High Road Capital Partners in connection with the sale of portfolio company General Tools & Instruments Company LLC, a provider of over 1,200 feature-rich, specialized tools with well-established brands, to Worthington Industries, Inc.
    • View All

    January 2024 Reprint

    PTAB Issues Back-to-Back Fintiv Denials After Dry Spell (IP Litigator)

    October 2023 Blog

    Patent Owner Unable to Change Inventorship During Remand, PTAB Litigation Blog

    March 2022 Blog

    PGR Estoppel Continues to be Broad and Onerous, PTAB Litigation Blog

    January 2022 Blog

    Board Requires Settlement Agreement to Dismiss Pre-Institution Proceeding, PTAB Litigation Blog

    April 2021 Blog

    Two’s a Crowd: Prior Art in Design Patent Claim Construction, PTAB Litigation Blog

    April 2021 Blog

    FedEx Delivery Sufficiently Akin to Priority Mail Express for Petition Service, PTAB Litigation Blog

    April 2021 Alert

    U.S. Supreme Court Ends Decade-Long Software Copyright Battle: Google Wins

    December 2020 Blog

    Fed. Cir. Reaffirms No State Sovereign Immunity in IPRs, PTAB Litigation Blog

    Before sending, please note:

    Information on www.jonesday.com is for general use and is not legal advice. The mailing of this email is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Anything that you send to anyone at our Firm will not be confidential or privileged unless we have agreed to represent you. If you send this email, you confirm that you have read and understand this notice.