T. KaitlinCrowder (Kait)

Associate

Cleveland + 1.216.586.7347

Connect:

Share

Kait Crowder's practice focuses on intellectual property, with a primary focus on patent litigation. She also has experience with trademark, trade secret, and unfair competition matters.

Kait assists clients with protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights through court and administrative actions as well as cease and desist efforts. She represents domestic and international clients in federal courts throughout the United States in patent and trademark infringement and in claims of unfair competition and trade secret misappropriation. She also represents clients in inter partes review proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. She has experience in many stages of litigation, including discovery, research, depositions, and motion practice.

Kait is a member of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association.

Experience

  • Google, YouTube defend ten-patent lawsuit relating to video encoding and processing techniquesJones Day defended Google LLC and YouTube LLC in a ten-patent case filed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC.
  • Google defends 15 patent infringement lawsuits brought by WSOU relating to multiple productsJones Day is acting as lead defense counsel on behalf of Google LLC in 15 patent infringement lawsuits in the Western District of Texas brought by WSOU Investments, LLC relating to a range of Google's products, including Pixel, YouTube TV, YouTube Music, G Suite, Gmail, and Nest Cam.
  • NXP sues Impinj for infringing eight patents relating to RFID and wafer-layout technologyJones Day is representing NXP Semiconductors N.V. in its enforcement of eight radio frequency identification ("RFID") and wafer-layout patents against Impinj, Inc.
  • DePuy Orthopaedics prevails in patent infringement lawsuit involving its flagship knee replacement productJones Day represents Johnson & Johnson subsidiaries DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.; DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc.; and DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. in their defense against claims of patent infringement brought by MedIdea, L.L.C. relating to the sale of their flagship posterior stabilized knee replacement product, Attune®.
  • DePuy Synthes defends against multi-patent lawsuit alleging infringement against stand-alone intervertebral spinal implant productsJones Day is representing Johnson & Johnson subsidiaries DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. and DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. in a patent infringement lawsuit brought by RSB Spine, LLC alleging that certain of its spinal implant products infringe two patents.
  • NXP battles allegations of infringing 26 RFID patentsJones Day is defending NXP USA, Inc. against allegations of infringing 26 patents relating to different aspects of RFID technology.
  • SKPI defeats Kaneka in patent infringement action regarding polyimide filmsJones Day obtained a summary judgment win on behalf of Korean-based SKC Kolon PI, Inc. ("SKPI"), which is principally engaged in the manufacture and distribution of polyimide films.
  • Elo Touch Solutions resolves multi-patent, multi-venue dispute with 3M regarding touch screen technologyJones Day represented Elo Touch Solutions, Inc. in a four-patent dispute with 3M regarding touch screen technology.
  • DePuy Synthes defends against patent infringement claims involving methods and instruments for spinal surgeryJones Day represents Johnson & Johnson subsidiaries DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.; DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc.; and Medical Device Business Services, Inc. in their defense against claims of patent infringement brought by Dr. Mark A. Barry relating to the use of certain methods and instruments for spinal surgery involving DePuy's Expedium® and Viper® systems.
  • NEC Display Solutions defends against attempt to bar importation of LED displaysJones Day is defending NEC Display Solutions (both the Japanese parent and a U.S. subsidiary) against allegations brought by Ultravision Technologies, LLC (“Ultravision”) that certain of NEC Display Solutions' modular LED display panels and related components infringe two patents allegedly owned by Ultravision.
    • View All

    June 2019 Blogs

    Reexamination Does not Reset the IPR Clock, PTAB Litigation Blog

    February 2019 Blogs

    No Motivation to Combine May Not End the Obviousness Inquiry, PTAB Litigation Blog

    January 2019 Blogs

    Overreaching May Result In Denial of Petition, PTAB Litigation Blog

    November 2018 Blogs

    Intervening Court Decisions May Prevent Denial of Review Under § 325(d), PTAB Litigation Blog

    October 2018 Blogs

    Indefiniteness Again Leads To Unsuccessful IPR Challenge, PTAB Litigation Blog

    September 2018 Blogs

    Clarified: Standing Requirements and Burden Shifting Framework in IPR Proceedings, PTAB Litigation Blog
    We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies and other tracking technologies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies.

    Before sending, please note:

    Information on www.jonesday.com is for general use and is not legal advice. The mailing of this email is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Anything that you send to anyone at our Firm will not be confidential or privileged unless we have agreed to represent you. If you send this email, you confirm that you have read and understand this notice.