PTAB Interprets "By Another" in 35 § 102(e), <i>PTAB Litigation Blog</i>

PTAB Interprets "By Another" in 35 § 102(e), PTAB Litigation Blog

Visit the Jones Day PTAB Litigation Blog.

In connection with a dispute over parking meters, the PTAB, on March 27, 2017, issued a decision in IPR2016-00067 that Duncan Parking Technologies, Inc. (DPT) had not met its burden of showing, by a preponderance of evidence, that claims 1-5, 7, and 9 of the U.S. Patent No. 7,854,310 ("the ‘310 patent"), owned by IPS Group, Inc. (IPS), were anticipated under 35 U.S.C. §102(e). With respect to claims 8 and 10, however, DPT met the requisite burden such that these claims were found to be unpatentable.

Read the full article at