Insights

  • Home
  • Insights
  • Bringing Prosecution History Back Into Claim Construction Under Broadest Reasonable Interpretation, PTAB Litigation Blog

Share

Bringing Prosecution History Back Into Claim Construction Under Broadest Reasonable Interpretation, <i>PTAB Litigation Blog</i>

Bringing Prosecution History Back Into Claim Construction Under Broadest Reasonable Interpretation, PTAB Litigation Blog

January 2017 Blog

Visit the PTAB Litigation Blog.

In D’Agostino v. MasterCard Int’l Inc. 2016-1592 & 2016-1593, the Federal Circuit vacated the Patent Trial and Appeal Board invalidation decisions in two related inter partes review proceedings, holding that the Board’s claim construction was unreasonable.  The patents at issue were D’Agostino’s U.S. Patent Nos. 7,840,486 and 8,036,988.  Both patents cover methods for facilitating a secure credit card transaction by using a transaction code instead of the credit card number itself.

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

You May Also Be Interested In

April 2024 Blog

“Known” Claim Elements Alone Insufficient for Motivation to Combine, PTAB Litigation Blog

April 2024 Alert

USPTO Issues New Guidance on Practitioners' Use of AI

April 2024 White Paper

Fifteenth Anniversary Update: Annotated Local Patent Rules for the Northern District of Illinois

April 2024 Blog

Availability of Document on Government Website Insufficient for Institution, PTAB Litigation Blog

Before sending, please note:

Information on www.jonesday.com is for general use and is not legal advice. The mailing of this email is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Anything that you send to anyone at our Firm will not be confidential or privileged unless we have agreed to represent you. If you send this email, you confirm that you have read and understand this notice.