Insights

Judge Gilstrap Denies Motion to Stay Because Defendant Relying on Third Party IPR Would Not Agree to be Fully Bound by Statutory Estoppel of 35 U.S.C. § 315, <i>PTAB Litigation Blog</i>

Judge Gilstrap Denies Motion to Stay Because Defendant Relying on Third Party IPR Would Not Agree to be Fully Bound by Statutory Estoppel of 35 U.S.C. § 315, PTAB Litigation Blog

Visit the Jones Day PTAB Litigation Blog.

In Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Kemper Corporation (accessible here), No. 6:16-cv-00081, Dkt No. 57 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2016) (Slip Op.), Judge Gilstrap made clear that a defendant in East Texas seeking a stay based on a third party petitioner’s IPR filing should agree to the same full statutory estoppel that binds the petitioner if the defendant wants its motion to be granted.

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies and other tracking technologies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies.