Insights

En Banc Federal Circuit Considering The Ground Rules For Claim Amendments In Post-Grant Proceedings: In re: Aqua Products, <i>PTAB Litigation Blog</i>

En Banc Federal Circuit Considering The Ground Rules For Claim Amendments In Post-Grant Proceedings: In re: Aqua Products, PTAB Litigation Blog

Visit the Jones Day PTAB Litigation Blog.

Claim amendments in IPRs are statutorily authorized by the AIA. 35 U.S.C. § 316(d)(1) provides that "[d]uring an inter partes review instituted under this chapter, the patent owner may file 1 motion to amend the patent in 1 or more of the following ways: (A) Cancel any challenged patent claim [or] (B) For each challenged claim, propose a reasonable number of substitute claims." The claims may be amended but not broadened in an IPR, as § 316(d)(3) further dictates that "[a]n amendment under this subsection may not enlarge the scope of the claims of the patent or introduce new matter."

To read the full article visit ptablitigationblog.com.

We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies and other tracking technologies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies.