Insights

Dynamic Drinkware Dooms Another Petitioner’s Prior Art, <i>PTAB Litigation Blog</i>

Dynamic Drinkware Dooms Another Petitioner’s Prior Art, PTAB Litigation Blog

Summary — Two Key Lessons:

  1. The petitioner bears the initial burden of production to show that a challenged patent is not entitled to its earliest effective filing date.
  2. Under Dynamic Drinkware, the petitioner must show that the claims of a published patent application are supported by a provisional application in order for that published application to be prior art as of the provisional application’s filing date.

To read more, visit our PTAB Litigation Blog.