Insights

Dynamic Drinkware Dooms Another Petitioner’s Prior Art, <i>PTAB Litigation Blog</i>

Dynamic Drinkware Dooms Another Petitioner’s Prior Art, PTAB Litigation Blog

Summary — Two Key Lessons:

  1. The petitioner bears the initial burden of production to show that a challenged patent is not entitled to its earliest effective filing date.
  2. Under Dynamic Drinkware, the petitioner must show that the claims of a published patent application are supported by a provisional application in order for that published application to be prior art as of the provisional application’s filing date.

To read more, visit our PTAB Litigation Blog.

We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies and other tracking technologies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies.