Business Restructuring Review

In this issue:

  • Rights offerings in Bankruptcy: More Than New Capital
    Over the past decade, rights offerings have become a valuable and frequently used source of exit financing for chapter 11 debtors.
  • In re Leslie Controls, Inc.: The Delaware Bankruptcy Court Weighs in on The Common-Interest Doctrine
    The court ruled that the doctrine protected communications relating to insurance coverage for potential asbestos liabilities which a debtor’s counsel shared with counsel to a committee of asbestos plaintiffs and to a proposed future-claims representative during restructuring negotiations.
  • Newsworthy
  • Texas Rangers: a Big Change-up on Impairment?
    A texas bankruptcy court held that, in order to render a secured creditor’s claim “unimpaired,” a Chapter 11 plan need not honor all of the creditor’s contractual rights, so long as the creditor retains the right to sue the debtor for breach of the contract.
  • In re Quigley Company, Inc.: New York Bankruptcy Court Denies Confirmation of Proposed Chapter 11 Asbestos Plan
    The court found that the Chapter 11 case was a Quigley bankruptcy "only in name" and that the debtor’s parent had arranged the case to protect itself from derivative liability for asbestos claims.
  • Forum Shopping, Portable COMI, and the Lessons of Wind Hellas
    The ability of a debtor to change its center of main interests from one country to another to find the jurisdiction best suited to successful insolvency proceedings has become a controversial aspect of cross-border insolvency laws enacted during the last decade.
  • Trademark-Licensee Limbo in Bankruptcy Continues
    A ruling recently handed down by the third circuit indicates that the rights of trademark licensees affected by a debtor’s rejection of a trademark-licensing agreement remain unclear.
  • Bankruptcy Trustee May Sell State-Law Avoidance Claims
    The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently addressed several issues that have created a split of authority among the federal circuits.
  • Rule 2019 update
    U.S. bankruptcy courts continue to struggle with the disclosure requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 2019 in anticipation of proposed changes to the rule.
  • From The Top
    Discussing bankruptcy-related developments in the U.S. Supreme Court’s October 2010 term.
We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies and other tracking technologies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies.