Ashvi Patel

Associate

Pittsburgh + 1.412.394.7208

Connect

Share

Ashvi Patel is an intellectual property lawyer whose experience includes patent prosecution and litigation that spans various technologies, including medical devices, pharmaceuticals, artificial intelligence, telecommunications, life sciences, and safety and food processing equipment.

Ashvi is registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Relying on her technical background, Ashvi has assisted clients with drafting and prosecuting domestic and foreign patents. She has assisted clients with inter partes reviews (IPRs) and post-grant reviews (PGRs) before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) as well as with Federal Circuit appeals.

Prior to obtaining her law degree, Ashvi leveraged her chemical and biomedical engineering degrees to gain significant industry experience with medical devices and pharmaceutical formulations. Ashvi is a member of the Firm's Women in IP initiative. She also maintains an active pro bono practice involving clemency law in Pennsylvania and the Firm's Border Project, advocating for asylum seekers fleeing violence in their home countries.

Erfahrung

  • Polaris asserts unlawful importation and sale and patent infringement against competitor CFMOTO at ITCJones Day represents complainants Polaris Inc., Polaris Industries Inc., and Polaris Sales Inc. (collectively "Polaris") in infringement and enforcement actions involving ten Polaris patents against its competitor CFMOTO based on companion complaints filed before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.
  • Parker Hannifin defends ITC Section 337 Investigation over corrosion-resistant coatings for metal componentsJones Day is representing Parker Hannifin Corporation and its co-resondents at the International Trade Commission (ITC) in a Section 337 patent infringement case brought by complainant Modumetal, Inc.
  • Chemtronics resolves patent infringement claims involving touch screen technologyJones Day represented Chemtronics Co., Ltd. against a competitor in a patent infringement case in the Eastern District of Texas.
    •

    March 2025 Blog

    PTAB Rescinds Discretionary Denial Memorandum, PTAB Litigation Blog

    April 2024 Blog

    Director Review: PTAB Must Articulate Bases for Section 325(d) Denial, PTAB Litigation Blog

    January 2024 Blog

    Petitioner Prevails In Institution Decision Do-Over After Director Steps In, PTAB Litigation Blog

    September 2023 Blog

    PTAB Rejects Double-Dose of Prior Art, PTAB Litigation Blog

    April 2023 Blog

    Prior Conception Defeats Otherwise Sufficient Derivation Showing, PTAB Litigation Blog

    December 2022 Blog

    Limited Stipulation Results In Fintiv Denial, PTAB Litigation Blog

    October 2022 Blog

    PTAB Declines To Apply Assignor Estoppel, PTAB Litigation Blog

    June 2021 Blog

    Awkwardly Divided Petitions Triggers § 314(a) Denials, PTAB Litigation Blog

    Bitte beachten Sie vor dem Versenden:

    Die Informationen auf unserer Website sind für den allgemeinen Gebrauch und stellen keine Rechtsberatung dar. Der Versand dieser E-Mail ist nicht dazu bestimmt, ein Mandatsverhältnis zu begründen, und der Erhalt dieser E-Mail stellt kein Mandatsverhältnis dar. Alles, was Sie an jemanden in unserer Kanzlei senden, ist nicht vertraulich oder privilegiert, es sei denn, wir haben zugestimmt, Sie zu vertreten. Wenn Sie diese E-Mail versenden, bestätigen Sie, dass Sie diesen Hinweis gelesen und verstanden haben.