Insights

  • Home
  • Insights
  • District Courts Split on Admissibility of Patent Owner IPR Victories, PTAB Litigation Blog

Share

District Courts Split on Admissibility of Patent Owner IPR Victories, <i>PTAB Litigation Blog</i>

District Courts Split on Admissibility of Patent Owner IPR Victories, PTAB Litigation Blog

November 2017 Blog

Visit the Jones Day PTAB Litigation Blog.

In an opinion dated October 12, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin granted a motion in limine to exclude evidence that a challenged patent had survived twenty post-issuance proceedings, including inter partes review ("IPR") proceedings. The opinion (Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Snap-On Inc., No. 14-CV-1296-JPS, ECF No. 277 (E.D. Wisc. Oct. 12, 2017)) is a recent addition to the collection of district court opinions that are split on this issue, and provides a detailed analysis in support of decisions favoring exclusion.

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

You May Also Be Interested In

April 2024 Blog

“Known” Claim Elements Alone Insufficient for Motivation to Combine, PTAB Litigation Blog

April 2024 Alert

USPTO Issues New Guidance on Practitioners' Use of AI

April 2024 White Paper

Fifteenth Anniversary Update: Annotated Local Patent Rules for the Northern District of Illinois

April 2024 Blog

Availability of Document on Government Website Insufficient for Institution, PTAB Litigation Blog

Before sending, please note:

Information on www.jonesday.com is for general use and is not legal advice. The mailing of this email is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Anything that you send to anyone at our Firm will not be confidential or privileged unless we have agreed to represent you. If you send this email, you confirm that you have read and understand this notice.