Robert A. Naeve | 专业人员

Bob Naeve的执业领域集中在复杂民事诉讼。他就涉嫌商业秘密盗窃、不当招揽雇员、失职、竞业禁止前后期的强制执法有关的不公平竞争诉讼具有丰富经验。

Bob还深入参与过《美国残疾人法案》第三章、加州《安鲁民权法案》《盲人权利法案》和《残障人士法案》以及各类联邦和州法规及建筑法项下提起的项目和设施访问诉讼。他在涉及大型零售商、互联网站点、公共和私有实体提供的其他项目和服务有关的全国集体诉讼中担任首席庭审律师。他还协助零售业和其他客户实施无障碍设施计划和审计事宜。

此外，Bob代理雇主经办各类雇佣诉讼。他曾担任首席庭审律师，经办零售业、银行业、食品服务和高科技工业领域雇佣方面的30多起工资工时集体诉讼；他还处理过无数的单一原告的不正当解雇、就业歧视、隐私侵犯和其他相关诉讼。

代理其公共领域客户时，Bob担任这些客户的首席审判和上诉律师经办过涉及以下法律的诉讼：《初审法院就业保护与管理法案》、加州《公共记录法案》项下访问公共记录的公众权利、按照《第59号提案》的《加州宪法》第三节第一条的修订和《美国残疾人法案》第二章、《康复法案》和加州宪法和美国宪法项下的项目和设施访问。

Bob著有雇佣法领域的多本书籍和专著，并经常就近期发展问题在当地和国家出版刊物上撰有文章。他的演讲很受欢迎，并经常向雇主团体和在公司内部研习会上就州和联邦的就业歧视法开展讲座。他还就建立人事政策和手册向本地、全国以及全球范围内的公司提供法律咨询建议。

Bob是美国、加州和奥兰治县律师协会的成员。他还在近期的《美国最佳律师》劳动与雇佣领域、《美国法律500强》雇员流动性和《钱伯斯美国》雇佣与劳动法领域获得认可。

经验

Cortec Group acquires Enthusiast Auto HoldingsJones Day advised the Cortec Group in connection with the acquisition and related financing of Ohio-based Enthusiast Auto Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries, an e-commerce distributor of automobile aftermarket and performance parts, including for Audi, BMW, Mercedes, Porsche, and Volkswagen.

Audit committee conducts independent investigation of allegations of financial and personal misconduct of CEO of American ApparelJones Day conducted, on behalf of the independent directors of American Apparel, an investigation of alleged misconduct and possible Sarbanes Oxley violations by the former CEO, resulting in his termination for non-suitability.

Williams-Sonoma and Pottery Barn successfully defend against Title III Accessibility class actionsJones Day defended Williams-Sonoma and Pottery Barn against two separate class action lawsuits arising under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Tech company resolves DOL auditJones Day represented a tech company with multi-state operations with respect to an audit of the Company's compliance with the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), as well as with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), being conducted by the United States Department of Labor (DOL).

Verizon California defeats class certification in California wage and hour class actionJones Day represented Verizon California in a wage and hour class action in which the plaintiff alleged that he was misclassified as exempt from California overtime requirements and sought to certify a class of Verizon California's first level FiOS supervisors on the basis of his California Labor Code and California Business & Professional Code claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.

Godiva negotiates settlement in series of wage and hour class actionsJones Day represents Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. in separate wage and hour class actions that challenge virtually every aspect of the Company’s wage and hour practices in California and involve every current and former exempt and non-exempt employee who worked at any Godiva retail outlet since 2005.

Publicly-traded retailer settles class actionJones Day represented a publicly-traded retailer in a class action in California, involving the alleged failure to provide meal and rest breaks to hourly employees, and the alleged failure to pay employees for all working hours.

South Coast Repertory, one of the primary not-for-profit performing arts centers in Orange County, California receives corporate and employment adviceAttorneys from Jones Day Irvine (and Los Angeles) provide ongoing corporate and employment advice for South Coast Repertory, one of the primary not-for-profit performing arts centers in Orange County, California.

JANUARY 2021

演讲

January 22, 2019
Labor & Employment Case and Statutory Update 2019, Jones Day MCLE University
May 17, 2016
Title III of the ADA, the Internet, and New Technology
January 27, 2016
2016 The Constantly Evolving Landscape: Employment Law in California, Jones Day University
October 14, 2010
2010 California Labor & Employment Law Briefing
October 8, 2009
Wage and Hour Litigation and Developments: Recent Trends, New Types of Cases, and What to Expect in 2009, Jones Day 2009 California Labor & Employment Law Briefing
January 29, 2009
Access in California -- the New Frontier/Public Accommodation Law in California, Jones Day 2009 MCLE University
September 18, 2008
Jones Day 2008 California Labor & Employment Law Briefing

Robert A.Naeve (Bob)

Partner

联系：

经验

California Supreme Court Rules Dynamex Is Retroactive

2019 California Employment Legislation Update

2018 California Employment Legislation and Regulatory Update

2017 California Employment Legislation and Regulatory Update

加州最高法院关于员工"待命"休息期的决定：这意味着什么以及员工该如何行事？（英文版）

Digital Health Law Update, Vol. II, Issue 5

Web Accessibility: DOJ Kicks the Regulatory Can - Again, Law360

美国加利福尼亚州劳动监管机构发布四个重要举措（英文版）

《美国残疾人法案》要求饮料贩卖机发声吗？（英文版）

West v. Moe’s Franchisor LLC, Metropolitan Corporate Counsel

演讲